imported>Pegship: Moving from Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals to Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2016 using Cat-a-lot

2020-11-18T20:11:00Z

Moving from Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals to Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2016 using Cat-a-lot

New page

{{archive}}

==Proposals, December 2016==
Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

=== Geographic breakup of [[:Category:Mexico radio station stubs|Mexico radio station stubs]] ===
{{sfp top}}
* Recent efforts (mostly by myself) to add more Mexican radio station articles to the encyclopedia have left this category bloated, at 1300 articles/7 pages, and with an impending auction of 250 new stations and the continuing award of new community services, this number will keep going up. I'd like to suggest breaking this up into stubs by state, so 32 new categories, potentially with a regional grouping as is used at [[:Category:United States radio station stubs]]. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 23:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
:Holy moly, you're right about the size of the category! How about 32 templates with regional categories, upmerged, until each template gets its 60+ ?? [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 23:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
::'''Upmerged stub tags''', creating first the regional categories (as defined by {{cl|Mexico geography stubs}}), and subsequently individual state categories, when each category would reach 60 stubs. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od Mishehu]] 06:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Od Mishehu}} I've created the regional cats. These states have 60 or more separate radio stations/xmtrs (though not necessarily as many articles) and may be in the running for their own: Baja California, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Mexico City, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michoacán, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Sinaloa, Sonora and Veracruz. Veracruz has some 100 stations and so it will need to be a priority. All but a handful of articles can be sorted based on the navbox they contain. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 08:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

=== Gaelic Football stub ===
{{sfp nocreate}}
*{{tl|Gaelicfootball-stub}} / [[:Category:Gaelic Football]]

There's a stub for every other football code and there are several bio stub templates for Gaelic football currently there. [[User:South Nashua|South Nashua]] ([[User talk:South Nashua|talk]]) 19:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
:How many is "several"? Can you find 60+? --[[User:Redrose64|Redrose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 00:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
::For the record, the permcat is {{cl|Gaelic football}}, and the bio stub type is {{tl|gaelic-football-bio-stub}} / {{cl|Gaelic football biography stubs}} (and it has 4 well-populated sub-types). The rest of the sub-cats of {{cl|Gaelic football}} are host to fewer than a dozen articles in most cases; even the category for Gaelic football clubs is pretty thin. If ever there's a sufficient # of articles under Gaelic football, I will support a stub template, but I think today is not that day. [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 01:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
:::But wouldn't the bios be a subcat, justifying the stub category for Gaelic Football? I'd support this. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|Rob13]][[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]] 20:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
::::The bios would be a subcat, but I don't think that justifies creating a parent cat, though it appeals to my sense of order. Any other opinions, folks? [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 17:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

=== 2010 singles genres ===
{{sfp create}}
Propose creating:

* {{tl|2010s-pop-single-stub}} / [[:Category:2010s pop single stubs]]
* {{tl|2010s-rock-single-stub}} / [[:Category:2010s rock single stubs]]

To break out the overpopulated [[:Category:2010s single stubs]]. I haven't run hard numbers on this, since such sorting usually needs to be done semi-automatically or manually, but the 2000s categories are so well-populated (>300 stubs each) that there's no doubt we can reach 60 stubs on each of these. Probably many more. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|Rob13]][[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]] 23:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

=== Moths again ===
{{sfp create}}
* {{tl|Calamotropha-stub}} / [[:Category:Calamotropha stubs]] ([https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?language=en&project=wikipedia&categories=Crambinae%7C10%0D%0ACrambinae%20stubs&ns%5B0%5D=1&links_to_all=Calamotropha&interface_language=en&active_tab=tab_templates_n_links&doit= 109])

One more genus to break out [[:Category:Crambinae stubs]]. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|Rob13]][[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]] 23:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

* {{tl|Bombycidae-stub}} / [[:Category:Bombycidae stubs]] ([https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?language=en&project=wikipedia&categories=Bombycidae%7C10%0D%0ABombycoidea%20stubs&ns%5B0%5D=1&interface_language=en&&doit= 286] - 74 = 212)
** {{tl|Apatelodes-stub}} / [[:Category:Apatelodes stubs]] ([https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?language=en&project=wikipedia&categories=Bombycidae%7C10%0D%0ABombycoidea%20stubs&ns%5B0%5D=1&links_to_all=Apatelodes&interface_language=en&active_tab=tab_templates_n_links&doit= 74])

Breaks out [[:Category:Bombycoidea stubs]]. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|Rob13]][[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]] 23:42, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}

[[Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2016|Proposals 2016 12]]

MyWiki:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2016/December - Revision history

imported>Pegship: Moving from Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals to Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2016 using Cat-a-lot