imported>Bruce1ee: fixed lint errors – obsolete HTML tags

2022-11-01T23:44:38Z

fixed lint errors – obsolete HTML tags

New page

<noinclude>
{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Special:Undelete| |{{#if:|<div style="display:none;">}} {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Wikipedia|{{#switch:{{NAMESPACE}}|= |<div style="display:none;">}}|{{error:not substituted|Archive header}}<div style="display:none;">}}}} {{#if:|</div></div>}}{| width = "100%"
|-
! colspan="3" align="center" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Help desk]]
|-
! width="20%" align="left" | < [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 June 4|June 4]]
! width="25%" align="center"|<< [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/May 2013|May]] | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/June 2013|June]] | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/July 2013|Jul]] >>
! width="20%" align="right" |{{#ifexist:Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 June 6|[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 June 6|June 6]]|[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Current help desk]]}} >
|}
{| align=center width=95% style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #003EBA;" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0"
|-
! style="background:#57DB1E; text-align: center;" align="center" | '''Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives'''
|-
| The page you are currently viewing is {{#ifexist:Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 June 15|an archive page|a [[Wikipedia:Transclusion|transcluded]] archive page}}. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|current Help Desk]] pages.
|}

__TOC__</noinclude>
= June 5 =

== Review of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/rench Society for Systems an Cybernetic Sciences]] ==

Why is it indicated in the creation title of '''afscet''' "''rench'' Society" and not "'''''F'''rench'' Society" ? — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pb64F|Pb64F]] ([[User talk:Pb64F|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pb64F|contribs]]) 04:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC) 

:Because the editor who moved the page made a typo or, more likely, a copy&paste error. The missing "d" in "and" was copied from your own introduction. Fixed. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 05:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

== Review of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ibs (formerly Interface Business Solutions)]] ==

[Draft removed.]
:That was a copy of your draft. How may we help you with that? [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 06:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SPRHO DELTA PHI]] ==

Hi,

Would like to ask for some inputs why my article in not approved.

Thanks,

[[User:Sprho|Sprho]] ([[User talk:Sprho|talk]]) 08:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:As I said on IRC, that draft doesn't cite any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:Independent sources|independent]] of the subject, such as articles about the fraternity published in newspapers or reputable magazines. We require significant coverage in such sources both to allow our readers to [[WP:V|verify]] the draft's content and to establish that the fraternity is [[WP:ORG|notable]] in the first place. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 09:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:In fact the whole thing needs to be completely rewritten to look read like an encyclopedia article. At the moment it's no more than a disjointed stream of consciousness.--[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 19:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Auger architectomics]] ==

Hi there, I had this entry declined because it 'sounded like an essay and not an encyclopedia entry' as well as using primary sources (ie. original research). Huh? I'm a science journalist, and I thought that primary sources were your best ones. I wrote this entry off a research paper published by the University concerned, because this is ground-breaking research. The paper has been picked up by the press and there are a number of newspaper and web articles written about it... are these the kind of sources you want? (Although I must say some of these articles have really got the wrong end of the stick). This is quite a difficult concept to explain in lay language as it is highly technical. I have read my entry several times, and I am not sure how I can rewrite it to sound more like an encyclopedia - do you mind telling me what is RIGHT with it, so that I can correct the wrong bits? Thanks so much - I write a lot about science and technology, and would like to become a regular contributor of new science, but it seems I have fallen at the first hurdle! [[User:Niki Moore|Niki Moore]] ([[User talk:Niki Moore|talk]]) 10:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:[[WP:PRIMARY|Primary]] sources are prone to bias, and as we have learned from, say, [[cold fusion]], a university's announcements are hardly the best sources on ground-breaking research. News reports would indeed be better sources, but the best sources on science topics are, of course, peer-reviewed papers published in scholarly journals (that's what I'd call a research paper; what you cite mostly is the equivalent of press releases, with one possible exception and a few broken links). [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 19:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

== Review of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Egorov Alexandre]] ==

Hello, if somebody can help me to finish the article "Alexandre Egorov".
Greetings, [[User:Sav86md|Sav86md]] ([[User talk:Sav86md|talk]]) 10:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:That draft needs [[WP:INCITE|inline citations]] to clarify which of the sources supports which of the draft's statements. The draft's tone is also problematic. For example: ''He creates a fairy tale about a timeless world, without conflicts between good and bad - a story expressing the desire for excellence.'' That's not the neutral, factual tone we aim for, and it conveys very little information. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 19:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

== Tagged for speedy ==

[[Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Rambert_Shaw|This]] is obvious nonsense by a bored vandal, but I didn't know what to do with it except tag it for speedy deletion to save everybody some time. Question: is there a special tag/warning for situations like these, or is a CSD tag okay? [[User_talk:Yintan|''' Yinta''''''n ''']] 12:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:I haven't seen the draft, but CSD obviously way OK. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 19:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

::OK, thanks. [[User_talk:Yintan|''' Yinta''''''n ''']] 21:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

== Unknown submission ==

I have submitted an article and one weak time for verification is given to me. now can i close the window and thenhow will i know if it is verified — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/119.160.125.14|119.160.125.14]] ([[User talk:119.160.125.14|talk]]) 14:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC) 

:You will have to check that page; you will also receive a notification at the talk page of the IP address (or account) you used to write the draft, but since that's not your current IP address I doubt that'll be of much help. Reviews take about two weeks right now.

== Review of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katherine Lorenz]] ==

In regard to:
[[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katherine Lorenz]]

I'm writing to confirm that the aforementioned submission is in queue for review.
If not, please advise on recommended next steps.
I look forward to hearing more.

Kindly,

Katebackstage[[User:Katebackstage|Katebackstage]] ([[User talk:Katebackstage|talk]]) 18:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:It isn't yet, but if you click the "click here" link in the grey box at the top of the page, it will be added to the queue.--[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 19:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

== Review of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin]] ==

In my article for submission, [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin]], I find that the proposed body is moved to the 'Talk' page as opposed to the 'Project page'. Should I move the text to the latter or is the talk page the appropriate place for it--as long as it's impending approval? --[[User:And Rew | And Rew]] 20:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
:It is where it is supposed to be. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]]) 22:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

== Review of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kanaiolowalu (Kanaʻiolowalu)]] ==

I'm a little confused because the article for creation I wrote has two inconsistent messages.

The first reads in part, "Article not currently submitted for review."

The second, third, and fourth, reads in part, "Review waiting. This may take over a week. The Articles for creation process is very highly backlogged. Please be patient. There are 1228 submissions waiting for review."

I submitted the piece for review a little more than a week ago.

[[User:KM8oh8|KM8oh8]] ([[User talk:KM8oh8|talk]]) 20:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:The "review waiting" messages are correct, the "not currently submitted" message was outdated. I removed it. Due to the backlog it may take another week or so until the draft is reviewed. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 23:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

MyWiki:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 June 5 - Revision history

imported>Bruce1ee: fixed lint errors – obsolete HTML tags