Symmetric derivative

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, the symmetric derivative is an operation generalizing the ordinary derivative.

It is defined as:[1][2] limh0f(x+h)f(xh)2h.

The expression under the limit is sometimes called the symmetric difference quotient.[3][4] A function is said to be symmetrically differentiable at a point x if its symmetric derivative exists at that point.

If a function is differentiable (in the usual sense) at a point, then it is also symmetrically differentiable, but the converse is not true. A well-known counterexample is the absolute value function f(x) = |x|, which is not differentiable at x = 0, but is symmetrically differentiable here with symmetric derivative 0. For differentiable functions, the symmetric difference quotient does provide a better numerical approximation of the derivative than the usual difference quotient.[3]

The symmetric derivative at a given point equals the arithmetic mean of the left and right derivatives at that point, if the latter two both exist.[1][2]: 6 

Neither Rolle's theorem nor the mean-value theorem hold for the symmetric derivative; some similar but weaker statements have been proved.

Examples

[edit | edit source]

The absolute value function

[edit | edit source]
File:Modulusfunction.png
Graph of the absolute value function. Note the sharp turn at x = 0, leading to non-differentiability of the curve at x = 0. The function hence possesses no ordinary derivative at x = 0. The symmetric derivative, however, exists for the function at x = 0.

For the absolute value function f(x)=|x|, using the notation fs(x) for the symmetric derivative, we have at x=0 that fs(0)=limh0f(0+h)f(0h)2h=limh0f(h)f(h)2h=limh0|h||h|2h=limh0|h||h|2h=limh002h=0.

Hence the symmetric derivative of the absolute value function exists at x=0 and is equal to zero, even though its ordinary derivative does not exist at that point (due to a "sharp" turn in the curve at x=0).

Note that in this example both the left and right derivatives at 0 exist, but they are unequal (one is −1, while the other is +1); their average is 0, as expected.

The function x−2

[edit | edit source]
File:Graphinversesqrt.png
Graph of y = 1/x2. Note the discontinuity at x = 0. The function hence possesses no ordinary derivative at x = 0. The symmetric derivative, however, exists for the function at x = 0.

For the function f(x)=1/x2, at x=0 we have fs(0)=limh0f(0+h)f(0h)2h=limh0f(h)f(h)2h=limh01/h21/(h)22h=limh01/h21/h22h=limh002h=0.

Again, for this function the symmetric derivative exists at x=0, while its ordinary derivative does not exist at x=0 due to discontinuity in the curve there. Furthermore, neither the left nor the right derivative is finite at 0, i.e. this is an essential discontinuity.

The Dirichlet function

[edit | edit source]

The Dirichlet function, defined as: f(x)={1,if x is rational0,if x is irrational has a symmetric derivative at every x, but is not symmetrically differentiable at any x; i.e. the symmetric derivative exists at rational numbers but not at irrational numbers.

Quasi-mean-value theorem

[edit | edit source]

The symmetric derivative does not obey the usual mean-value theorem (of Lagrange). As a counterexample, the symmetric derivative of f(x) = |x| has the image {−1, 0, 1}, but secants for f can have a wider range of slopes; for instance, on the interval [−1, 2], the mean-value theorem would mandate that there exist a point where the (symmetric) derivative takes the value |2||1|2(1)=13.[5]

A theorem somewhat analogous to Rolle's theorem but for the symmetric derivative was established in 1967 by C. E. Aull, who named it quasi-Rolle theorem. If f is continuous on the closed interval [a, b] and symmetrically differentiable on the open interval (a, b), and f(a) = f(b) = 0, then there exist two points x, y in (a, b) such that fs(x) ≥ 0, and fs(y) ≤ 0. A lemma also established by Aull as a stepping stone to this theorem states that if f is continuous on the closed interval [a, b] and symmetrically differentiable on the open interval (a, b), and additionally f(b) > f(a), then there exist a point z in (a, b) where the symmetric derivative is non-negative, or with the notation used above, fs(z) ≥ 0. Analogously, if f(b) < f(a), then there exists a point z in (a, b) where fs(z) ≤ 0.[5]

The quasi-mean-value theorem for a symmetrically differentiable function states that if f is continuous on the closed interval [a, b] and symmetrically differentiable on the open interval (a, b), then there exist x, y in (a, b) such that[5][2]: 7 

fs(x)f(b)f(a)bafs(y).

As an application, the quasi-mean-value theorem for f(x) = |x| on an interval containing 0 predicts that the slope of any secant of f is between −1 and 1.

If the symmetric derivative of f has the Darboux property, then the (form of the) regular mean-value theorem (of Lagrange) holds, i.e. there exists z in (a, b) such that[5] fs(z)=f(b)f(a)ba.

As a consequence, if a function is continuous and its symmetric derivative is also continuous (thus has the Darboux property), then the function is differentiable in the usual sense.[5]

Generalizations

[edit | edit source]

The notion generalizes to higher-order symmetric derivatives and also to n-dimensional Euclidean spaces.

The second symmetric derivative

[edit | edit source]

The second symmetric derivative is defined as[6][2]: 1  limh0f(x+h)2f(x)+f(xh)h2.

If the (usual) second derivative exists, then the second symmetric derivative exists and is equal to it.[6] The second symmetric derivative may exist, however, even when the (ordinary) second derivative does not. As example, consider the sign function sgn(x), which is defined by sgn(x)={1if x<0,0if x=0,1if x>0.

The sign function is not continuous at zero, and therefore the second derivative for x=0 does not exist. But the second symmetric derivative exists for x=0: limh0sgn(0+h)2sgn(0)+sgn(0h)h2=limh0sgn(h)20+(sgn(h))h2=limh00h2=0.

See also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ a b c d Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ a b c d e Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
[edit | edit source]