Coordinates: 32°03′09″N 78°36′22″E / 32.0525°N 78.6062°E / 32.0525; 78.6062

Sumdo, Himachal Pradesh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Sumdo)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sumdo
Village
Lua error in Module:Infobox_mapframe at line 197: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
Lua error in Module:Location_map at line 411: Malformed coordinates value.
Coordinates: Lua error in Module:Coordinates at line 489: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
CountryFile:Flag of India.svg India
StateHimachal Pradesh
DistrictLahul and Spiti
TehsilSpiti
Area
 • Total
221.92 km2 (85.68 sq mi)
Elevation
3,090 m (10,140 ft)
Population
 (2011)[1]
 • Total
598
Time zoneUTC+5:30 (IST)

Sumdo is a village in the Lahul and Spiti district, in Himachal Pradesh, India. It is at the confluence of the Pare Chu river with the Spiti River. Sumdo is close to the border with Tibet, the opposite side on the Tibetan side being the Tsosib Sumkyil Township (Churup Sumkhel).[2] China claims the village as part of its Tsamda County, Tibet.

Geography

[edit | edit source]

Sumdo lies in the Zanskar Range on the bank of the Spiti River near its confluence with the Pare Chu river (or Parang River). Pare Chu originates in Spiti and takes a circuitous route through Ladakh and Tibet's Tsamda County, finally reentering Spiti at Kaurik, 20 east of Sumdo. It joins the Spiti River at Sumdo, the combined river being called "Li River".

Across the border at Kaurik is the village of Churup (Tsurup), the seat of the Tsosib Sumkyil Township in Tsamda County of the Tibet region of China.

Sino-Indian border dispute

[edit | edit source]

In 1847, when the British border commission headed by Alexander Cunningham went to the Indo-Tibetan border at Kaurik, the commissioners were unobustructed till reaching that place, but were prohibited from going beyond. They sent a letter to the governor of Gartok, and followed a circuitous route through Spiti to enter Ladakh. (Spiti was traditionally part of Ladakh, but it was recently annexed by British India.)[3][4]

In December 1957, seven years after the Chinese annexation of Tibet, Chinese forces were said to have intruded at Kaurik, for which India lodged a protest. In 1959, after the Kongka La incident, that China raised a number of disputes regarding the mutual border, including at Kaurik.[5] However, there have been no clashes at this location till date.

During the 1990s, a joint working group of India and China held multiple meetings and exchaned maps of the "middle sector" of the border in 2000. The Kaurik area, including Gue and Sumdo, was identified as one of the locations where the claims of the two countries overlapped, and the disputed territory was estimated to be 250 square kilometres (97 sq mi).[6][7]

Transportation

[edit | edit source]

Sumdo is served by two national highways—NH 5 (Sumdo-Nako-Shimla Highway) through Kinnaur district and NH 505 (Sumdo-Kaza-Gramphu-Manali highway) through the Spiti River valley. The latter remains closed for 7 months due to winter snows on the Kunzum Pass (4,551 m or 14,931 ft).[8] A dual-use airstrip, 100 km to the west, is under construction, scheduled to be completed in 2024.[9]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Spiti: Legend & lore, Spectrum (Tribune India), 10 June 2007.
  3. ^ Cunningham, Correspondence of the Commissioners (1848), pp. 89–90.
  4. ^ Kaul, India China Boundary (2003), pp. 55–56: "Thus in Spiti, it is clear, that the boundary ran along the villages of Khyuri [Kaurik], Shaktolb and Chooret.".
  5. ^ Verghese, A Reassessment of Indian Policy in Asia (2016), pp. 104–105.
  6. ^ Gupta, The Himalayan Face-off (2014), p. 106.
  7. ^ Sushant Singh, De-escalation process underway: 2 LAC flashpoints are not in list of identified areas still contested, The Indian Express, 4 June 2020.
  8. ^ BRO restores Sumdho-Gramphu road after seven months, The Tribune, 26 May 2021.
  9. ^ To counter China, Nyoma airfield in Ladakh to be full-fledged base in 2 years, The Tribune, 5 Jan 2023.
Sources
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).