Red Sea Dam
| Red Sea Dam | |
|---|---|
| File:Red Sea topographic map-en.jpg The proposal is to dam the narrow inlet to the Red Sea, shown at the bottom-right of the image. | |
| Lua error in Module:Infobox_mapframe at line 197: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value). | |
| Location | Djibouti Yemen |
| Coordinates | Lua error in Module:Coordinates at line 489: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value). |
| Dam and spillways | |
| Impounds | Bab-el-Mandeb Strait |
| Length | 29 km (18 mi) |
| Power Station | |
| Installed capacity | 50,000 MW |
Expression error: Unexpected < operator
The Red Sea Dam is a speculative macro-engineering proposal put forward in 2007 by a group of scientists and engineers.[1] Although the authors' intentions are to explore "the ethical and environmental dilemmas and some of the political implications of macro-engineering", the proposal has attracted both criticism and ridicule.[2]
Proposal
[edit | edit source]The idea is to dam the Red Sea at its southern end where the Bab-al-Mandab Strait is only 29 km (18 mi) wide. Natural evaporation would rapidly lower the level of the enclosed Red Sea, by about 2.1 meters per year (6.8 feet per year).[3] Water rushing back into the sea would then drive turbines to generate electricity. The dam would have the potential to generate 50 gigawatts of emissions-free hydroelectric power. In comparison, the largest nuclear power plant in the United States has an output of 3.2 gigawatts.[4]
Implications
[edit | edit source]The proposal's authors point out that "Macro-engineering projects of this size cause massive destruction of existing ecologies", a point emphasized by critics[5] who note the damage caused by current, far smaller schemes.
The authors also note the benefits of the project. Besides helping to satisfy the region's growing energy needs, there are environmental benefits to the scheme: "On the positive side of the environmental scale, however, are the big reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and the reduced pace of fossil hydrocarbon resource exhaustion".
Peter Bosshard,[6] policy director of International Rivers in California, an anti-dam organization, condemned the scheme as ludicrous.
See also
[edit | edit source]Lua error in mw.title.lua at line 392: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal').
References
[edit | edit source]- ^ Power from closing the Red Sea: Economic and ecological costs and benefits following the isolation of the Red Sea by Roelof Dirk Schuiling, Viorel Badescu, Richard B. Cathcart, Jihan Seoud, Jaap C. Hanekamp
- ^ New Scientist critique
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Live Science on the environmental impact
- ^ Red Sea mega-dam would be 'irresponsible' New Scientist, 07 December 2007 by Phil McKenna
External links
[edit | edit source]- Gibraltar Strait Dam Macroprojects Archived 2016-11-06 at the Wayback Machine by Richard Cathcart, one of the authors of the Red Sea Dam proposal.