Pascal's rule

In mathematics, Pascal's rule (or Pascal's formula) is a combinatorial identity about binomial coefficients. The binomial coefficients are the numbers that appear in Pascal's triangle. Pascal's rule states that for positive integers n and k, $(\binom{n - 1}{k}) + (\binom{n - 1}{k - 1}) = (\binom{n}{k}),$ where $(\binom{n}{k})$ is the binomial coefficient, namely the coefficient of the $x k$ term in the expansion of $(1 + x) n$ . There is no restriction on the relative sizes of $n$ and $k$ ;^[1] in particular, the above identity remains valid when $n < k$ since $(\binom{n}{k}) = 0$ whenever $n < k$ .

Together with the boundary conditions $(\binom{n}{0}) = (\binom{n}{n}) = 1$ for all nonnegative integers n, Pascal's rule determines that $(\binom{n}{k}) = \frac{n!}{k! (n - k)!},$ for all integers $0 \leq k \leq n$ . In this sense, Pascal's rule is the recurrence relation that defines the binomial coefficients.

Pascal's rule can also be generalized to apply to multinomial coefficients.

Combinatorial proof

Pascal's rule has an intuitive combinatorial meaning, that is clearly expressed in this counting proof.^[2]^: 44

Proof. Recall that $(\binom{n}{k})$ equals the number of subsets with k elements from a set with n elements. Suppose one particular element is uniquely labeled X in a set with n elements.

To construct a subset of k elements containing X, include X and choose k − 1 elements from the remaining n − 1 elements in the set. There are $(\binom{n - 1}{k - 1})$ such subsets.

To construct a subset of k elements not containing X, choose k elements from the remaining n − 1 elements in the set. There are $(\binom{n - 1}{k})$ such subsets.

Every subset of k elements either contains X or not. The total number of subsets with k elements in a set of n elements is the sum of the number of subsets containing X and the number of subsets that do not contain X, $(\binom{n - 1}{k - 1}) + (\binom{n - 1}{k})$ .

This equals $(\binom{n}{k})$ ; therefore, $(\binom{n}{k}) = (\binom{n - 1}{k - 1}) + (\binom{n - 1}{k})$ .

Algebraic proof

Alternatively, the algebraic derivation of the binomial case follows. $\begin{matrix} (\binom{n - 1}{k}) + (\binom{n - 1}{k - 1}) & = \frac{(n - 1)!}{k! (n - 1 - k)!} + \frac{(n - 1)!}{(k - 1)! (n - k)!} \\ = (n - 1)! [\frac{n - k}{k! (n - k)!} + \frac{k}{k! (n - k)!}] \\ = (n - 1)! \frac{n}{k! (n - k)!} \\ = \frac{n!}{k! (n - k)!} \\ = (\binom{n}{k}) . \end{matrix}$

An alternative algebraic proof using the alternative definition of binomial coefficients: $(\binom{n}{k}) = \frac{n (n - 1) \dots (n - k + 1)}{k!}$ . Indeed

$\begin{matrix} (\binom{n - 1}{k}) + (\binom{n - 1}{k - 1}) & = \frac{(n - 1) \dots ((n - 1) - k + 1)}{k!} + \frac{(n - 1) \dots ((n - 1) - (k - 1) + 1)}{(k - 1)!} \\ = \frac{(n - 1) \dots (n - k)}{k!} + \frac{(n - 1) \dots (n - k + 1)}{(k - 1)!} \\ = \frac{(n - 1) \dots (n - k + 1)}{(k - 1)!} [\frac{n - k}{k} + 1] \\ = \frac{(n - 1) \dots (n - k + 1)}{(k - 1)!} \cdot \frac{n}{k} \\ = \frac{n (n - 1) \dots (n - k + 1)}{k!} \\ = (\binom{n}{k}) . \end{matrix}$

Since $(\binom{z}{k}) = \frac{z (z - 1) \dots (z - k + 1)}{k!}$ is used as the extended definition of the binomial coefficient when z is a complex number, thus the above alternative algebraic proof shows that Pascal's rule holds more generally when n is replaced by any complex number.

Generalization

Pascal's rule can be generalized to multinomial coefficients.^[2]^: 144 For any integer p such that $p \geq 2$ , $k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p} \in ℤ^{+},$ and $n = k_{1} + k_{2} + k_{3} + \dots + k_{p} \geq 1$ , $(\binom{n - 1}{k_{1} - 1, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p}}) + (\binom{n - 1}{k_{1}, k_{2} - 1, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p}}) + \dots + (\binom{n - 1}{k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p} - 1}) = (\binom{n}{k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p}})$ where $(\binom{n}{k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p}})$ is the coefficient of the $x_{1}^{k_{1}} x_{2}^{k_{2}} \dots x_{p}^{k_{p}}$ term in the expansion of $(x_{1} + x_{2} + \dots + x_{p})^{n}$ .

The algebraic derivation for this general case is as follows.^[2]^: 144 Let p be an integer such that $p \geq 2$ , $k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p} \in ℕ^{+},$ and $n = k_{1} + k_{2} + k_{3} + \dots + k_{p} \geq 1$ . Then $\begin{matrix} (\binom{n - 1}{k_{1} - 1, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p}}) + (\binom{n - 1}{k_{1}, k_{2} - 1, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p}}) + \dots + (\binom{n - 1}{k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p} - 1}) \\ = \frac{(n - 1)!}{(k_{1} - 1)! k_{2}! k_{3}! \dots k_{p}!} + \frac{(n - 1)!}{k_{1}! (k_{2} - 1)! k_{3}! \dots k_{p}!} + \dots + \frac{(n - 1)!}{k_{1}! k_{2}! k_{3}! \dots (k_{p} - 1)!} \\ = \frac{k_{1} (n - 1)!}{k_{1}! k_{2}! k_{3}! \dots k_{p}!} + \frac{k_{2} (n - 1)!}{k_{1}! k_{2}! k_{3}! \dots k_{p}!} + \dots + \frac{k_{p} (n - 1)!}{k_{1}! k_{2}! k_{3}! \dots k_{p}!} = \frac{(k_{1} + k_{2} + \dots + k_{p}) (n - 1)!}{k_{1}! k_{2}! k_{3}! \dots k_{p}!} \\ = \frac{n (n - 1)!}{k_{1}! k_{2}! k_{3}! \dots k_{p}!} = \frac{n!}{k_{1}! k_{2}! k_{3}! \dots k_{p}!} = (\binom{n}{k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3}, \dots, k_{p}}) . \end{matrix}$

References

^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
^ ^a ^b ^c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

Bibliography

Merris, Russell. Combinatorics. John Wiley & Sons. 2003 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

External links

Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

This article incorporates material from Pascal's triangle on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

This article incorporates material from Pascal's rule proof on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

[1] Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

[Brualdi-2] Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

[1]

[2]

Pascal's rule

Contents

Combinatorial proof

Algebraic proof

Generalization

See also

References

Bibliography

External links

Navigation menu

Pascal's rule

Combinatorial proof

Algebraic proof

Generalization

See also

References

Bibliography

External links

Navigation menu

Search