Kan fibration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Kan complex)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, Kan complexes and Kan fibrations are part of the theory of simplicial sets. Kan fibrations are the fibrations of the standard model category structure on simplicial sets and are therefore of fundamental importance. Kan complexes are the fibrant objects in this model category. The name is in honor of Daniel Kan.

For various kinds of fibrations for simplicial sets, see Fibration of simplicial sets.

Definitions

[edit | edit source]

Definition of the standard n-simplex

[edit | edit source]
File:2dKanFibration.svg
The striped blue simplex in the domain has to exist in order for this map to be a Kan fibration

For each n β‰₯ 0, recall that the standard n-simplex, Ξ”n, is the representable simplicial set

Ξ”n(i)=Hom𝜟([i],[n])

Applying the geometric realization functor to this simplicial set gives a space homeomorphic to the topological standard n-simplex: the convex subspace of ℝn+1 consisting of all points (t0,,tn) such that the coordinates are non-negative and sum to 1.

Definition of a horn

[edit | edit source]

For each k β‰€ n, this has a subcomplex Ξ›kn, the k-th horn inside Ξ”n, corresponding to the boundary of the n-simplex, with the k-th face removed. This may be formally defined in various ways, as for instance the union of the images of the n maps Ξ”nβˆ’1β†’Ξ”n corresponding to all the other faces of Ξ”n.[1] Horns of the form Ξ›k2 sitting inside Ξ”2 look like the black V at the top of the adjacent image. If X is a simplicial set, then maps

s:Λkn→X

correspond to collections of n (nβˆ’1)-simplices satisfying a compatibility condition, one for each 0≀k≀nβˆ’1. Explicitly, this condition can be written as follows. Write the (nβˆ’1)-simplices as a list (s0,,skβˆ’1,sk+1,,sn) and require that

disj=djβˆ’1si for all i<j with i,jβ‰ k.[2]

These conditions are satisfied for the (nβˆ’1)-simplices of Ξ›kn sitting inside Ξ”n.

Definition of a Kan fibration

[edit | edit source]
File:Kan fibration.png
Lifting diagram for a Kan fibration

A map of simplicial sets f:Xβ†’Y is a Kan fibration if, for any nβ‰₯1 and 0≀k≀n, and for any maps s:Ξ›knβ†’X and y:Ξ”nβ†’Y such that f∘s=y∘i (where i is the inclusion of Ξ›kn in Ξ”n), there exists a map x:Ξ”nβ†’X such that s=x∘i and y=f∘x. Stated this way, the definition is very similar to that of fibrations in topology (see also homotopy lifting property), whence the name "fibration".

Technical remarks

[edit | edit source]

Using the correspondence between n-simplices of a simplicial set X and morphisms Δn→X (a consequence of the Yoneda lemma), this definition can be written in terms of simplices. The image of the map fs:Λkn→Y can be thought of as a horn as described above. Asking that fs factors through yi corresponds to requiring that there is an n-simplex in Y whose faces make up the horn from fs (together with one other face). Then the required map x:Δn→X corresponds to a simplex in X whose faces include the horn from s. The diagram to the right is an example in two dimensions. Since the black V in the lower diagram is filled in by the blue 2-simplex, if the black V above maps down to it then the striped blue 2-simplex has to exist, along with the dotted blue 1-simplex, mapping down in the obvious way.[3]

Kan complexes defined from Kan fibrations

[edit | edit source]

A simplicial set

X

is called a Kan complex if the map from

X→{*}

, the one-point simplicial set, is a Kan fibration. In the model category for simplicial sets,

{*}

is the terminal object and so a Kan complex is exactly the same as a fibrant object. Equivalently, this could be stated as: if every map

α:Λkn→X

from a horn has an extension to

Ξ”n

, meaning there is a lift

α~:Δn→X

such that

α=α~∘ι

for the inclusion map

ΞΉ:Ξ›knβ†ͺΞ”n

, then

X

is a Kan complex. Conversely, every Kan complex has this property, hence it gives a simple technical condition for a Kan complex.

Examples

[edit | edit source]

Simplicial sets from singular homology

[edit | edit source]

An important example comes from the construction of singular simplices used to define singular homology, called the singular functor[4]pg 7

S:Top→sSets

.

Given a space

X

, define a singular

n

-simplex of X to be a continuous map from the standard topological

n

-simplex (as described above) to

X

,

f:Δn→X

Taking the set of these maps for all non-negative n gives a graded set,

S(X)=∐nSn(X).

To make this into a simplicial set, define face maps di:Sn(X)β†’Snβˆ’1(X) by

(dif)(t0,,tnβˆ’1)=f(t0,,tiβˆ’1,0,ti,,tnβˆ’1)

and degeneracy maps si:Sn(X)β†’Sn+1(X) by

(sif)(t0,,tn+1)=f(t0,,tiβˆ’1,ti+ti+1,ti+2,,tn+1).

Since the union of any n+1 faces of Ξ”n+1 is a strong deformation retract of Ξ”n+1, any continuous function defined on these faces can be extended to Ξ”n+1, which shows that S(X) is a Kan complex.[5]

Relation with geometric realization

[edit | edit source]

It is worth noting the singular functor is right adjoint to the geometric realization functor

|⋅|:sSets→Top

giving the isomorphism

HomTop(|X|,Y)β‰…HomsSets(X,S(Y))

See also: Milnor's theorem on Kan complexes.

Simplicial sets underlying simplicial groups

[edit | edit source]

It can be shown that the simplicial set underlying a simplicial group is always fibrant[4]pg 12. In particular, for a simplicial abelian group, its geometric realization is homotopy equivalent to a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces

∏i∈IK(Ai,ni)

In particular, this includes classifying spaces. So the spaces

S1≃K(β„€,1)

,

β„‚β„™βˆžβ‰ƒK(β„€,2)

, and the infinite lens spaces

Lqβˆžβ‰ƒK(β„€/q,2)

are correspond to Kan complexes of some simplicial set. In fact, this set can be constructed explicitly using the Dold–Kan correspondence of a chain complex and taking the underlying simplicial set of the simplicial abelian group.

Geometric realizations of small groupoids

[edit | edit source]

Another important source of examples are the simplicial sets associated to a small groupoid 𝒒. This is defined as the geometric realization of the simplicial set [Ξ”op,𝒒] and is typically denoted B𝒒. We could have also replaced 𝒒 with an infinity groupoid. It is conjectured that the homotopy category of geometric realizations of infinity groupoids is equivalent to the homotopy category of homotopy types. This is called the homotopy hypothesis.

Mapping space

[edit | edit source]

Let X be an ∞-category. Then for each object x,y, let MapX(x,y) be the fiber of (s,t):Hom_(Ξ”1,X)β†’X2 over the point (x,y). Then MapX(x,y) is a Kan complex.[6]

Postnikov section

[edit | edit source]

Let X be a Kan complex. Then the n-th Postnikov section PnX is a simplicial set such that PnXm is the coequalizer of Xm⇉cosknXm.[7] Then the following can be verified directly:

  • PnX is a Kan complex and Xβ†’PnX is a Kan fibration.
  • The induced map Ο€iXβ†’Ο€iPnX is an isomorphism for i=0 and for each 0<i≀n and choice of a base point on X.
  • Ο€iX=0 for each i>n and choice of a base point on X.

For a simplicial set X, we then let PnX=PnEx∞X where Ex∞ is an Ex∞ functor.

Non-example: standard n-simplex

[edit | edit source]

It turns out the standard

n

-simplex

Ξ”n

is not a Kan complex[8]pg 38. The construction of a counter example in general can be found by looking at a low dimensional example, say

Ξ”1

. Taking the map

Ξ›02β†’Ξ”1

sending

[0,2]↦[0,0][0,1]↦[0,1]

gives a counter example since it cannot be extended to a map

Ξ”2β†’Ξ”1

because the maps have to be order preserving. If there was a map, it would have to send

0↦01↦12↦0

but this isn't a map of simplicial sets.

Categorical properties

[edit | edit source]

Simplicial enrichment and function complexes

[edit | edit source]

For simplicial sets

X,Y

there is an associated simplicial set called the function complex

𝐇𝐨𝐦(X,Y)

, where the simplices are defined as

𝐇𝐨𝐦n(X,Y)=HomsSets(XΓ—Ξ”n,Y)

and for an ordinal map

ΞΈ:[m]β†’[n]

there is an induced map

ΞΈ*:𝐇𝐨𝐦(X,Y)n→𝐇𝐨𝐦(X,Y)m

(since the first factor of Hom is contravariant) defined by sending a map

f:X×Δn→Y

to the composition

X×Δm→1×θX×Δn→fY

Exponential law

[edit | edit source]

This complex has the following exponential law of simplicial sets

ev*:HomsSets(K,𝐇𝐨𝐦(X,Y))β†’HomsSets(XΓ—K,Y)

which sends a map

f:K→𝐇𝐨𝐦(X,Y)

to the composite map

XΓ—Kβ†’1Γ—gX×𝐇𝐨𝐦(X,Y)β†’evY

where ev(x,f)=f(x,ΞΉn) for ΞΉn∈HomΞ”([n],[n]) lifted to the n-simplex Ξ”n.

Kan fibrations and pull-backs

[edit | edit source]

Given a (Kan) fibration

p:X→Y

and an inclusion of simplicial sets

i:Kβ†ͺL

, there is a fibration[4] pg 21

𝐇𝐨𝐦(L,X)β†’(i*,p*)𝐇𝐨𝐦(K,X)×𝐇𝐨𝐦(K,Y)𝐇𝐨𝐦(L,Y)

(where

𝐇𝐨𝐦

is in the function complex in the category of simplicial sets) induced from the commutative diagram

𝐇𝐨𝐦(L,X)β†’p*𝐇𝐨𝐦(L,Y)i*↓↓i*𝐇𝐨𝐦(K,X)β†’p*𝐇𝐨𝐦(K,Y)

where

i*

is the pull-back map given by pre-composition and

p*

is the pushforward map given by post-composition. In particular, the previous fibration implies

p*:𝐇𝐨𝐦(L,X)→𝐇𝐨𝐦(L,Y)

and

i*:𝐇𝐨𝐦(L,Y)→𝐇𝐨𝐦(K,Y)

are fibrations.

The above is a consequence of a theorem of Gabriel and Zisman.

Homotopy groups of Kan complexes

[edit | edit source]

The homotopy groups of a fibrant simplicial set may be defined combinatorially, using horns, in a way that agrees with the homotopy groups of the topological space which realizes it. For a Kan complex

X

and a vertex

x:Ξ”0β†’X

, as a set

Ο€n(X,x)

is defined as the set of maps

α:Δn→X

of simplicial sets fitting into a certain commutative diagram:

Ο€n(X,x)={Ξ±:Ξ”nβ†’X:Ξ”nβ†’Ξ±X↑↑xβˆ‚Ξ”nβ†’Ξ”0}

Notice the fact

βˆ‚Ξ”n

is mapped to a point is equivalent to the definition of the sphere

Sn

as the quotient

Bn/βˆ‚Bn

for the standard unit ball

Bn={xβˆˆβ„n:||x||eu≀1}

Defining the group structure requires a little more work. Essentially, given two maps

α,β:Δn→X

there is an associated

(n+1)

-simplice

Ο‰:Ξ”n+1β†’X

such that

dnω:Δn→X

gives their addition. This map is well-defined up to simplicial homotopy classes of maps, giving the group structure. Moreover, the groups

Ο€n(X,x)

are Abelian for

nβ‰₯2

. For

Ο€0(X)

, it is defined as the homotopy classes

[x]

of vertex maps

x:Ξ”0β†’X

.

Homotopy groups of simplicial sets

[edit | edit source]

Using model categories, any simplicial set

X

has a fibrant replacement

X^

which is homotopy equivalent to

X

in the homotopy category of simplicial sets. Then, the homotopy groups of

X

can be defined as[citation needed]

Ο€n(X,x):=Ο€n(X^,x^)

where

x^

is a lift of

x:Ξ”0β†’X

to

X^

. These fibrant replacements can be thought of a topological analogue of resolutions of a chain complex (such as a projective resolution or a flat resolution).

Kan complexes themselves form a weak Kan complex called Kan. Namely, first consider the category K where objects are Kan complexes and morphisms maps of simplicial sets. As a category of presheaves has internal Hom, each hom-set in K has a structure of a simplicial set; in short, K is a simplicial category. The homotopy coherent nerve of it

𝐊𝐚𝐧:=Nhc(K)

is then a weak Kan complex (∞-category).[9] In view of homotopy hypothesis, it is often taken as the ∞-category of spaces = ∞-groupoids and is also denoted as 𝖲 or some other variants.

See also: universal left fibration.

See also

[edit | edit source]

Footnotes

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ See Goerss and Jardine, page 7
  2. ^ May 1992, p. 2
  3. ^ May uses this simplicial definition; see May 1992, p. 25
  4. ^ a b c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  5. ^ See May, page 3
  6. ^ Cisinski 2023, Β§ 3.7.1.
  7. ^ Β§ 5.6. in Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

References

[edit | edit source]
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Pierre Gabriel, Michel Zisman, Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 35, Springer (1967) [1]
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).