Faltings's theorem
| File:Gerd Faltings MFO.jpg Gerd Faltings | |
| Field | Arithmetic geometry |
|---|---|
| Conjectured by | Louis Mordell |
| Conjectured in | 1922 |
| First proof by | Gerd Faltings |
| First proof in | 1983 |
| Generalizations | Bombieri–Lang conjecture Mordell–Lang conjecture |
| Consequences | Siegel's theorem on integral points |
Faltings's theorem is a result in arithmetic geometry, according to which a curve of genus greater than 1 over the field of rational numbers has only finitely many rational points. This was conjectured in 1922 by Louis Mordell,[1] and known as the Mordell conjecture until its 1983 proof by Gerd Faltings.[2] The conjecture was later generalized by replacing by any number field.
Background
[edit | edit source]Let be a non-singular algebraic curve of genus over . Then the set of rational points on may be determined as follows:
- When , there are either no points or infinitely many. In such cases, may be handled as a conic section.
- When , if there are any points, then is an elliptic curve and its rational points form a finitely generated abelian group. (This is Mordell's Theorem, later generalized to the Mordell–Weil theorem.) Moreover, Mazur's torsion theorem restricts the structure of the torsion subgroup.
- When , according to Faltings's theorem, has only a finite number of rational points.
Proofs
[edit | edit source]Igor Shafarevich conjectured that there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of abelian varieties of fixed dimension and fixed polarization degree over a fixed number field with good reduction outside a fixed finite set of places.[3] Aleksei Parshin showed that Shafarevich's finiteness conjecture would imply the Mordell conjecture, using what is now called Parshin's trick.[4]
Gerd Faltings proved Shafarevich's finiteness conjecture using a known reduction to a case of the Tate conjecture, together with tools from algebraic geometry, including the theory of Néron models.[5] The main idea of Faltings's proof is the comparison of Faltings heights and naive heights via Siegel modular varieties.[a]
Later proofs
[edit | edit source]- Paul Vojta gave a proof based on Diophantine approximation.[6] Enrico Bombieri found a more elementary variant of Vojta's proof.[7]
- Brian Lawrence and Akshay Venkatesh gave a proof based on p-adic Hodge theory, borrowing also some of the easier ingredients of Faltings's original proof.[8]
Consequences
[edit | edit source]Faltings's 1983 paper had as consequences a number of statements which had previously been conjectured:
- The Mordell conjecture that a curve of genus greater than 1 over a number field has only finitely many rational points;
- The Isogeny theorem that abelian varieties with isomorphic Tate modules (as -modules with Galois action) are isogenous.
A sample application of Faltings's theorem is to a weak form of Fermat's Last Theorem: for any fixed there are at most finitely many primitive integer solutions (pairwise coprime solutions) to , since for such the Fermat curve has genus greater than 1.
Generalizations
[edit | edit source]Because of the Mordell–Weil theorem, Faltings's theorem can be reformulated as a statement about the intersection of a curve with a finitely generated subgroup of an abelian variety . Generalizing by replacing by a semiabelian variety, by an arbitrary subvariety of , and by an arbitrary finite-rank subgroup of leads to the Mordell–Lang conjecture, which was proved in 1995 by McQuillan[9] following work of Laurent, Raynaud, Hindry, Vojta, and Faltings.
Another higher-dimensional generalization of Faltings's theorem is the Bombieri–Lang conjecture that if is a pseudo-canonical variety (i.e., a variety of general type) over a number field , then is not Zariski dense in . Even more general conjectures have been put forth by Paul Vojta.
The Mordell conjecture for function fields was proved by Yuri Ivanovich Manin[10] and by Hans Grauert.[11] In 1990, Robert F. Coleman found and fixed a gap in Manin's proof.[12]
Notes
[edit | edit source]- ^ "Faltings relates the two notions of height by means of the Siegel moduli space.... It is the main idea of the proof." Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
Citations
[edit | edit source]References
[edit | edit source]- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). → Contains an English translation of Faltings (1983)
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). → Gives Vojta's proof of Faltings's Theorem.
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). (Translation: Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). )
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
Lua error in Module:Authority_control at line 153: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).