The Divine Legation of Moses
The Divine Legation of Moses is the best-known work of William Warburton, an English theologian of the 18th century who became bishop of Gloucester. As its full title makes clear, it is a conservative defence of orthodox Christian belief against deism, by means of an apparent paradox: the afterlife is not mentioned in terms in the Pentateuch (i.e. Torah – see Jewish eschatology), making Mosaic Judaism distinctive among ancient religions; from which, Warburton argues, it is seen that Moses received a divine revelation.[1]
The Divine Legation was published in two parts and nine books from 1738 by Warburton, who left it unfinished. It is a learned and discursive work, and excited extensive controversy in Warburton's lifetime, which the author pursued with acrimony. One side-issue, the history of writing, was treated by Warburton in a manner that proved influential.[2]
A modern opinion, from J. G. A. Pocock, is that the book is a "strange and flawed work of undisciplined genius".[3]
Reception timeline
[edit | edit source]- 1738 First part published.[1]
- 1738 Warburton publishes a Vindication to an anonymous attack (by William Webster).[1]
- 1741 Second part published.[1]
- 1743 Reply from Thomas Bott.[4] Thomas Chubb in An Enquiry Concerning Redemption[5] hit back at some comments of Warburton's.[6]
- 1744 The section dealing with the origin of language is translated into French by Léonard de Malpeines, as Essai sur les hiéroglyphes des Égyptiens.[7] Warburton issues the first part of a two-part reply to critics,[8] to Conyers Middleton, Richard Pococke, Richard Grey; and also Mark Akenside, John Tillard, Julius Bate and Nicholas Mann.[1]
- 1745 Warburton issues the second part of his reply[9] to Arthur Ashley Sykes and Henry Stebbing.
- 1751 A German translation[10] begins publication, and is reviewed by Gotthold Ephraim Lessing.[11]
- 1766 In an anonymous work, Robert Lowth takes issue with Warburton,[12] over a 1765 addition to the Divine Legation (appendix to book 5) concerning the Book of Job.[13]
- 1770 Edward Gibbon attacks Warburton's interpretation of Æneid book VI.[1]
References
[edit | edit source]- ^ a b c d e f Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). (Subscription, Wikipedia Library access or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ J. G. A. Pocock, Barbarism and Religion II (1999), p. 388.
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). (Subscription, Wikipedia Library access or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
- ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value). (Subscription, Wikipedia Library access or UK public library membership required.)
Lua error in Module:Authority_control at line 153: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).