Strategic Organizing Center

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Change to Win)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Strategic Organizing Center
AbbreviationSOC
FoundedSeptember 27, 2005 (2005-09-27)
TypeTrade union center
HeadquartersWashington, DC, US
Location
  • United States
Formerly called
Change to Win Federation

The Strategic Organizing Center (SOC), formerly known as the Change to Win Federation (CtW), is a North American national trade union center originally formed in 2005 as an alternative to the AFL-CIO. The coalition is associated with strong advocacy of the organizing model. The coalition currently consists of Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the United Farm Workers (UFW), and the Communications Workers of America (CWA), the former and latter of which are affiliated with both the SOC and the AFL-CIO.[1] Michael Zucker is currently listed as the Executive Director of the organization since 2020.[2]

The SOC also includes SOC Investment Group, a shareholder engagement arm of the SOC that challenges management of large, publicly traded companies targeted by the SOC's campaigns.

Changes in federation membership

[edit | edit source]

<timeline> ImageSize = width:440 height:auto barincrement:22 PlotArea = left:82 bottom:65 top:10 right:15 AlignBars = justify DateFormat = yyyy Period = from:2000 till:2027 TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal format:yyyy ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:5 start:2000 ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:2000 Legend = orientation:vertical position:bottom columns:1

Colors = 

 id:SOC value:rgb(0.86,0.24,0.26) legend:SOC
 id:dual value:rgb(0.93,0.58,0.60) legend:Both_SOC_and_AFL-CIO
 id:AFL-CIO value:gray(0.82)     legend: AFL-CIO

BarData = 

 bar:Carpenters text:Carpenters
 bar:CWA text:CWA
 bar:LIUNA text:LIUNA
 bar:SEIU text:SEIU
 bar:Teamsters text:Teamsters
 bar:UFCW text:UFCW
 bar:UFW text:UFW
 bar:UNITEHERE text:"UNITE HERE"

PlotData= 

 width:12 textcolor:black align:left anchor:from shift:(5,-4)

 bar:Carpenters from:2000 till:2001 color:AFL-CIO
 bar:Carpenters from:2005 till:2009 color:SOC

 bar:CWA from:2000 till:2019 color:AFL-CIO
 bar:CWA from:2019 till:end color:dual

 bar:LIUNA from:2000 till:2005 color:AFL-CIO
 bar:LIUNA from:2005 till:2006 color:dual
 bar:LIUNA from:2006 till:2010 color:SOC
 bar:LIUNA from:2010 till:end color:AFL-CIO

 bar:SEIU from:2000 till:2005 color:AFL-CIO
 bar:SEIU from:2005 till:2025 color:SOC
 bar:SEIU from:2025 till:end color:dual

 bar:Teamsters from:2000 till:2005 color:AFL-CIO
 bar:Teamsters from:2005 till:2022 color:SOC

 bar:UFCW from:2000 till:2005 color:AFL-CIO
 bar:UFCW from:2005 till:2013 color:SOC
 bar:UFCW from:2013 till:end color:AFL-CIO

 bar:UFW from:2000 till:2005 color:AFL-CIO
 bar:UFW from:2005 till:2006 color:dual
 bar:UFW from:2006 till:end color:SOC

 bar:UNITEHERE from:2004 till:2005 color:AFL-CIO
 bar:UNITEHERE from:2005 till:2009 color:SOC
 bar:UNITEHERE from:2009 till:end color:AFL-CIO

</timeline>

National affiliations of current and former SOC affiliates since 2000

In the summer of 2009, the United Brotherhood of Carpenters disaffiliated from Change to Win.[3]

After a bitter and divisive internal battle, a third of the members of UNITE HERE left that union and joined SEIU. The remaining 265,000 members of UNITE HERE reaffiliated with the AFL–CIO on September 16, 2009.[4][5]

The Laborers' International Union of North America said it would also leave Change to Win and rejoin the AFL–CIO on August 13, 2010.[6] LIUNA officials did not immediately explain their reasons, but AFL–CIO officials said the reaffiliation would be formalized in October 2010.[6]

On August 8, 2013, the United Food and Commercial Workers announced that they would be leaving Change to Win and re-affiliating with the AFL–CIO.[7]

On January 8, 2025, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) announced that they are reuniting with the AFL-CIO, bringing the total membership of the AFL-CIO to nearly 15 million members. [8]

Possible reunification with the AFL–CIO

[edit | edit source]

On January 9, 2009, national news media reported that five of the seven CtW unions had met with seven of the largest unions in the AFL–CIO in talks which explored the possibility of the five CtW unions rejoining the larger labor federation.[9] Impetus for the talks came as the Obama administration signalled to both labor federations that it preferred to deal with a united rather than fragmented labor movement.[10] Also, several Change to Win unions also concluded that they were not getting any significant advantage from being in a separate labor federation, and that a fragmented labor union was doing more harm than good.[10][11] David Bonior, a former US Congressman who once led the AFL–CIO's American Rights at Work division and who was a member of Barack Obama's presidential transition team, facilitated the meeting, and said talks were scheduled to last several weeks.[9][10][12] The five CtW unions present included the Laborers, SEIU, the Teamsters, UFCW, and UNITE HERE.[9] AFL–CIO unions present included AFSCME, the AFT, the Electrical Workers, the UAW, and the United Steelworkers.[12] Also in attendance was Dennis Van Roekel, president of the National Education Association, which is independent and belongs to neither group.[10]

A number of major issues were discussed in the opening round of talks. One major point of discussion revolved around who would lead any reunited federation.[9] AFL–CIO President John Sweeney was widely expected to retire at the trade union center's August 2009 convention, and Laborer's president Terence O'Sullivan and AFL–CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka had been discussed as his successors.[9][10][13] The nature of the AFL–CIO presidency was part of the leadership talks, with some unions suggesting that the presidency rotate among member unions while others hoped for a strong and vocal "executive director" position.[10] The two sides agreed that any reunited labor federation should have a stronger voice in national politics as well as have a greater say in helping member unions engage in more new member organizing.[10] The two sides also discussed whether to change the name of the AFL–CIO, or whether to adopt an entirely new organizational structure.[10] Among other issues discussed were: How the AFL–CIO/new organization would encourage new member organizing and at what level (national or local), what a reunited labor movement's political priorities should be, what sort of relationship a reunited labor movement will have with the Democratic and Republican parties, the level of member union dues, and globalization issues.[10][13] Although one news outlet reported that the 12 unions hoped to settle on a reunification agreement by April 15, 2009,[10] no issues were resolved in the first round of talks.[13]

The talks drew some limited criticism from members of the labor movement for not addressing issues of union democracy.[14]

Amazon campaign

[edit | edit source]
See also: Amazon worker organization

The SOC has worked with a number of different labor unions, think tanks and other advocacy organizations in recent years to address labor and competition issues at Amazon—the second-largest employer in the US. The SOC has worked to shine a light on health and safety issues at Amazon warehouses,[15] antitrust concerns pertaining to Amazon acquisitions, such as the pending merger with MGM studios,[16] and how the company uses its market power to impose unfair conditions on sellers using Amazon's e-commerce platform.[17]

Partner organizations

[edit | edit source]

SOC Investment Group (formerly CtW Investment Group) is an affiliate that is co-located within the Strategic Organizing Center.[18][19] SOC Investment Group advances SOC organizing campaigns by filing shareholder resolutions and engaging shareholders of publicly traded companies to vote against management.[20][21] Examples of companies targeted include Amazon, McDonald's, Electronic Arts, and CVS Health.[22][23][24][25] While SOC Investment Group is cited in media reports as an investment adviser that works with union-backed pensions,[26][27] the group's website says it does not provide investment advice or act as a fiduciary for any pension funds.[28]

See also

[edit | edit source]

Lua error in mw.title.lua at line 392: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal').

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ LM2 2020
  3. ^ MacGillis, Alec. "For Unions, A Time of Opportunity and Worry." The Washington Post. September 15, 2009.
  4. ^ Greenhouse, Steven. "Union Rejoining A.F.L.-C.I.O." New York Times. September 17, 2009.
  5. ^ Stutz, Howard. "Culinary Parent UNITE HERE Rejoins AFL-CIO, Ending Four-Year Separation." Las Vegas Review-Journal. September 18, 2009.
  6. ^ a b "Construction Workers' Union to Rejoin A.F.L.-C.I.O." Associated Press. August 14, 2010.
  7. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ a b c d e Maher, Kris. "AFL-CIO, Breakaway Unions Discuss Reuniting." Wall Street Journal. January 9, 2009.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Greenhouse, Steven. "Labor Calls for Unity After Years of Division." New York Times. January 7, 2009.
  11. ^ Meyerson, Harold. "Labor's Real Fight." Los Angeles Times. February 1, 2009.
  12. ^ a b Knowles, Francine. "AFL-CIO, Change to Win May Reunite." Archived 2009-01-18 at the Wayback Machine Chicago Sun-Times. January 8, 2009.
  13. ^ a b c Ambinder, Marc. "Behind The Labor Merger Talks." Archived 2009-01-12 at the Wayback Machine Atlantic Monthly. January 9, 2009.
  14. ^ Leedham, Tom. "Reunification Without Democracy--What’s the Point?" Labor Notes. February 2009.
  15. ^ Greene, Jay. "Amazon warehouse workers suffer serious injuries at higher rates than other firms" Washington Post. June 2021.
  16. ^ Weprin, Alex. "Amazon’s MGM Takeover: Labor Coalition Lobbies FTC to Halt Deal" The Hollywood Reporter. August 2021.
  17. ^ Weise, Karen. "Unions Push F.T.C. to Study if Amazon Warps the Economy" New York Times. February 2020.
  18. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  19. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  20. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  21. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  22. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  23. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  24. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  25. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  26. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  27. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  28. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
[edit | edit source]
  • Lua error in Module:Official_website at line 94: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).

Lua error in Module:Authority_control at line 153: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).

Retrieved from "http://70.231.62.181/index.php?title=Strategic_Organizing_Center&oldid=6777031"