Alliance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Allied)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Childe Hassam - Allies Day.jpg
Allies Day, May 1917, National Gallery of Art
File:Allies at the Brandenburg Gate, 1945.jpg
Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery decorates Soviet Marshals and generals at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, 12 July 1945.

An alliance is a relationship among people, groups, or states that have joined together for mutual benefit or to achieve some common purpose, whether or not an explicit agreement has been worked out among them.[1] Members of an alliance are called allies. Alliances form in many settings, including political alliances, military alliances, and business alliances.

Examples

[edit | edit source]

When spelled with a capital "A", "the Allies" usually denotes the countries who fought together against the Central Powers in World War I (the Allies of World War I), or those who fought against the Axis Powers in World War II (the Allies of World War II).[2]

In the second half of the 20th century, the Cold War was characterised by the intense rivalry between the military alliances of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, as each competed to expand and maintain their spheres of influence.[3]

More recently, the term "Allied forces" has also been used to describe the coalition of the Gulf War, as opposed to forces the Multi-National Forces in Iraq which are commonly referred to as "Coalition forces" or, as by the George W. Bush administration, "the coalition of the willing".

At the onset of the 21st century, shifts in the global order led to the formation of new alliances rooted in ideological and historical precedents, exemplified by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). This alliance possesses a broad and vaguely defined agenda, with its members exhibiting varying degrees of commitment to and motivations for participating in this initiative.[4] The inaugural BRICS meeting occurred in 2006. In 2023, the alliance expanded with the invitation of six new members—Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates—and was rebranded as BRICS Plus.

Effects

[edit | edit source]

Scholars are divided as to the impact of alliances. Several studies find that defensive alliances deter conflict.[5][6][7][8] One study questions these findings, showing that alliance commitments deterred conflict in the prenuclear era but has no statistically meaningful impact on war in the postnuclear era.[9][10] Another study finds that while alliance commitments deter conflict between sides with a recent history of conflict, alliances tend to provoke conflicts between states without such a history.[11]

A 2000 study in the Journal of Conflict Resolution found that allies fulfill their alliance commitments approximately 75% of the time.[12] Most research suggests that democracies are more reliable allies than non-democracies.[13][14][15] A 2004 study did however question whether alliance commitments by democracies are more durable.[16] A 2018 study updated and extended the data from the 2000 Journal of Conflict Resolution study and found that allies only fulfill their commitments about 50% of the time from 1816 to 2003.[17] According to the study, "States honored their alliance commitments 66% of the time prior to 1945 but the compliance rate drops to 22% from 1945 to 2003. Moreover, the rates of fulfillment for defense pacts (41%) and nonaggression pacts (37%) are dramatically lower than offensive alliances (74%) and neutrality agreements (78%)."[17]

One of the most profound effects of alliances can be seen in technological innovation, due to conduits of knowledge flows that are open between allies but closed between rivals.[18]

International opinion

[edit | edit source]
File:BlankMap-World-large-limited-recognition (1).png
Map indicating international preferences for principal ally in the case a country were attacked, as of 2017.

According to a 2017 poll by WIN/GIA, the United States was the most preferred ally internationally. Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China (CRINK), who preferred one another, both trailed America globally. Four countries, Bulgaria, Greece, Slovenia and Turkey, preferred Russia, despite being members of NATO.[19]

In Pakistan, 72% of respondents preferred ties to China, the largest margin of any country surveyed, while 46% of Bangladesh preferred India. A total of 22 countries indicated a preference for the United Kingdom at a rate of 10% or more, but the United States was the only country to prefer Britain over any other, at a rate of 43%. Five countries preferred France at a rate of 10% or more, led by Belgium at a rate of 25%. A single country, Iraq, expressed no preference, while three other countries, Lebanon, Palestine, and Slovenia, expressed no preference at a rate of 11% or more, although at a smaller rate than their preference for Russia on the part of Lebanon and Slovenia, and China on the part of Palestine. Kosovo reported the most unified opinion, preferring the United States at a rate of 92%, while Russia's most unified supporters were Mongolia (71%), Armenia (67%) and Serbia (56%). In total, 21 countries expressed a preference for America at a rate of 50% or more.[19]

Results of 2017 poll by WIN/GIA.
Most preferred ally in case of military threat[19][20]
figures of United States lower than 30%, Russia (<14%), of United Kingdom (<10%), France (<6%), none (<12%) and China (<10%) may be hidden
Country polled Russia United States United Kingdom China India France none
File:Flag of Mongolia.svg Mongolia
71%
File:Flag of Armenia.svg Armenia
67%
File:Flag of Serbia.svg Serbia
56%
16%
File:Flag of Greece.svg Greece
48%
 China
47%
File:Flag of Bulgaria.svg Bulgaria
42%
17%
4%
File:Flag of Ukraine.svg Ukraine
33%
35%
11%
File:Flag of Slovenia.svg Slovenia
30%
8%
15%
File:Flag of Latvia.svg Latvia
27%
11%
14%
File:Flag of Lebanon.svg Lebanon
25%
15%
23%
File:Flag of Turkey.svg Turkey
23%
9%
31%
File:Flag of North Macedonia.svg North Macedonia
23%
33%
17%
File:Flag of Mexico.svg Mexico
22%
42%
11%
9%
File:Flag of Peru.svg Peru
21%
44%
14%
File:Flag of Iran.svg Iran
20%
30%
File:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina.svg Bosnia and Herzegovina
19%
12%
43%
File:Flag of Vietnam.svg Vietnam
18%
File:Flag of India.svg India
16%
50%
File:Flag of Finland.svg Finland
15%
37%
16%
 Romania
15%
51%
7%
File:Flag of South Africa.svg South Africa
15%
45%
21%
File:Flag of Albania.svg Albania
14%
66%
10%
File:Flag of Kosovo.svg Kosovo
92%
File:Flag of South Korea.svg South Korea
49%
10%
32%
File:Flag of Papua New Guinea.svg Papua New Guinea
70%
13%
File:Flag of Israel.svg Israel
68%
10%
File:Flag of the Philippines.svg Philippines
67%
16%
File:Flag of Japan.svg Japan
64%
 Canada
62%
12%
File:Flag of Ghana.svg Ghana
62%
10%
File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom
58%
8%
File:Flag of Ecuador.svg Ecuador
58%
File:Flag of Lithuania.svg Lithuania
58%
10%
File:Flag of Paraguay.svg Paraguay
57%
File:Flag of Brazil.svg Brazil
55%
10%
File:Flag of France.svg France
54%
13%
File:Flag of Spain.svg Spain
52%
12%
File:Flag of Denmark.svg Denmark
52%
23%
File:Flag of Fiji.svg Fiji
52%
15%
12%
 Norway
51%
23%
File:Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia
49%
16%
 Poland
49%
10%
File:Flag of Germany.svg Germany
41%
19%
 Italy
41%
11%
File:Flag of Nigeria.svg Nigeria
41%
File:Flag of Portugal (official).svg Portugal
40%
21%
File:Flag of the Taliban.svg Afghanistan
39%
22%
17%
File:Flag of Iceland.svg Iceland
38%
27%
File:Flag of Thailand.svg Thailand
38%
11%
29%
File:Flag of Argentina.svg Argentina
36%
13%
22%
File:Flag of Ireland.svg Ireland
34%
25%
File:Flag of Indonesia.svg Indonesia
32%
10%
21%
 Czech Republic
32%
15%
6%
File:Flag of Sweden.svg Sweden
31%
29%
6%
File:Flag of Estonia.svg Estonia
31%
16%
File:Flag of Belgium (civil).svg Belgium
30%
12%
25%
File:Flag of Austria.svg Austria
16%
File:Flag of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.svg DR Congo
16%
8%
File:Flag of Palestine.svg Palestine
17%
8%
12%
File:Flag of the United States.svg United States
43%
7%
 Iraq
6%
27%
File:Flag of Pakistan.svg Pakistan
72%
File:Flag of Bangladesh.svg Bangladesh
16%
46%
File:Flag of Russia.svg Russia
44%
4%

See also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  2. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  3. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  4. ^ Do Vale, Helder Ferreira, et al. "Member Countries' Level of Commitment to BRICS: Measurements and Propositions." Changing the Global Political Economy: BRICS Countries and Alternative Relations Strategies, edited by Ayfer Gedikli, et al., IGI Global, 2025, pp. 49–92. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7393-4.ch002
  5. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  6. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  7. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  8. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  9. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  10. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  11. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  12. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  13. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  14. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  15. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  16. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  17. ^ a b Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  18. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  19. ^ a b c Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
  20. ^ Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

Bibliography

[edit | edit source]
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).
[edit | edit source]
  • File:Wiktionary-logo-en-v2.svg The dictionary definition of ally at Wiktionary
  • Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2172: attempt to index field '?' (a nil value).

Lua error in Module:Authority_control at line 153: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).